Home
References
You don’t have to be Sherlock Holmes to use your powers of deductive reasoning … or would that be inductive reasoning?
What’s the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning?
During the scientific process, deductive reasoning is used to reach a logical and true conclusion. Another type of reasoning, inductive, is also commonly used. People often confuse deductive reasoning with inductive reasoning; however, important distinctions separate these two pathways to a logical conclusion.
What is deductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning, also known as deduction, is a basic form of reasoning. It starts out with a general statement, or hypothesis, and examines the possibilities to reach a specific, logical conclusion, according to Norman Herr (opens in new tab), a professor of secondary education at California State University in Northridge The scientific method uses deduction to test hypotheses and theories, which predict certain outcomes if they are correct, said Dr. Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller (opens in new tab), a researcher and professor emerita at Albert Einstein College of Medicine.
“We go from the general — the theory — to the specific — the observations,” Wassertheil-Smoller told Live Science.
In deductive reasoning there is a first premise, then a second premise and finally an inference (a conclusion based on reasoning and evidence). A common form of deductive reasoning is the syllogism, in which two statements — a major premise and a minor premise — together reach a logical conclusion. For example, the major premise “Every A is B” could be followed by the minor premise, “This C is A.” Those statements would lead to the conclusion “This C is B.” Syllogisms are considered a good way to test deductive reasoning to make sure the argument is valid.
Here’s how deductive reasoning works. For the conclusion to be correct, the hypothesis must be sound. (Image credit: Shutterstock)
It’s true, this is a spider. (Image credit: Shutterstock)
And since all spiders have 8 legs, this one must have 8 legs. This is an example of deductive reasoning which is valid because the initial premise is true. (Image credit: Shutterstock)
For example, “All spiders have eight legs. A tarantula is a spider. Therefore, tarantulas have eight legs.” For deductive reasoning to be sound, the hypothesis must be correct. It is assumed that the statements, “All spiders have eight legs” and “a tarantula is a spider” are true. Therefore, the conclusion is logical and true. In deductive reasoning, if something is true of a class of things in general, it is also true for all members of that class.
Deductive conclusions are reliable provided the premises are true, according to Herr. The argument, “All bald men are grandfathers. Harold is bald. Therefore, Harold is a grandfather,” is valid logically, but it is untrue because the original premise is false.
A woodcut engraving of Sherlock Holmes examining clues with his friend Dr. Watson. The famous detective was all about deductive reasoning and known for saying: “http://www.livescience.com/”Eliminate all other factors, and the one which remains must be the truth.” (Image credit: Art illustration by Sidney Paget, author Sir Arthur Conan Doyle/Getty)
(opens in new tab)
What is inductive reasoning
Inductive reasoning moves from observation, to generalization to theory. (Image credit: designer491/Getty)
While deductive reasoning begins with a premise that is proven through observations, inductive reasoning extracts a likely (but not certain) premise from specific and limited observations. There is data, and then conclusions are drawn from the data; this is called inductive logic, according to the University of Illinois (opens in new tab) in Springfield.
“In inductive inference, we go from the specific to the general. We make many observations, discern a pattern, make a generalization, and infer an explanation or a theory,” Wassertheil-Smoller told Live Science. “In science, there is a constant interplay between inductive inference (based on observations) and deductive inference (based on theory), until we get closer and closer to the ‘truth,’ which we can only approach but not ascertain with complete certainty.”
In other words, the reliability of a conclusion made with inductive logic depends on the completeness of the observations. For instance, let’s say that you have a bag of coins; you pull three coins from the bag, and each coin is a penny. Using inductive logic, you might then propose that all of the coins in the bag are pennies.”Even though all of the initial observations — that each coin taken from the bag was a penny — are correct, inductive reasoning does not guarantee that the conclusion will be true.
Here’s another example: “Penguins are birds. Penguins can’t fly. Therefore, all birds can’t fly.” The conclusion does not follow logically from the statements.
Nevertheless, inductive reasoning has its place in the scientific method, and scientists use it to form hypotheses and theories. Deductive reasoning then allows them to apply the theories to specific situations.
Deductive reasoning examples
Here are some examples of deductive reasoning:
Major premise: All mammals have backbones.
Minor premise: Humans are mammals.
Conclusion: Humans have backbones.
Major premise: All birds lay eggs.
Minor premise: Pigeons are birds.
Conclusion: Pigeons lay eggs.
Major premise: All plants perform photosynthesis.
Minor premise: A cactus is a plant.
Conclusion: A cactus performs photosynthesis.
Deductive reasoning moves from a general statement to a reach a specific logical conclusion. In this case, if all plants use photosynthesis, and cacti are plants, then all cacti use photosynthesis is a valid example of deductive reasoning. (Image credit: mikroman6/Getty)Inductive reasoning examples
Here are some examples of inductive reasoning:
Data: I see fireflies in my backyard every summer.
Hypothesis: This summer, I will probably see fireflies in my backyard.
Data: I tend to catch colds when people around me are sick.
Hypothesis: Colds are infectious.
Data: Every dog I meet is friendly.
Hypothesis: Most dogs are usually friendly.
If every dog you meet is friendly, it is reasonable to form the hypothesis that most dogs are usually friendly. This is an example of inductive reasoning. (Image credit: Sally Anscombe/Getty)What is abductive reasoning
Another form of scientific reasoning that diverges from inductive and deductive reasoning is abductive. Abductive reasoning usually starts with an obviously incomplete set of observations and proceeds to the likeliest possible explanation for the data, a (opens in new tab)ccording to Butte College (opens in new tab) in Oroville, California. It is based on making and testing hypotheses using the best information available. It often entails making an educated guess after observing a phenomenon for which there is no clear explanation.
For example, a person walks into their living room and finds torn-up papers all over the floor. The person’s dog has been alone in the apartment all day. The person concludes that the dog tore up the papers because it is the most likely scenario. It’s possible that a family member with a key to the apartment destroyed the papers, or it may have been done by the landlord, but the dog theory is the most likely conclusion.
Abductive reasoning is useful for forming hypotheses to be tested. Abductive reasoning is often used by doctors who make a diagnosis based on test results, and by jurors who make decisions based on the evidence presented to them.
Additional resourcesThis guide from Scholastic (opens in new tab) provides ideas for teaching younger kids all about scientific reasoning. PBS has put together some video clips and games (opens in new tab) about deductive and inductive reasoning.This book written by Christopher Moore (opens in new tab) provides information on how to use scientific reasoning in the classroom.
Alina Bradford is a contributing writer for Live Science. Over the past 16 years, Alina has covered everything from Ebola to androids while writing health, science and tech articles for major publications. She has multiple health, safety and lifesaving certifications from Oklahoma State University. Alina’s goal in life is to try as many experiences as possible. To date, she has been a volunteer firefighter, a dispatcher, substitute teacher, artist, janitor, children’s book author, pizza maker, event coordinator and much more.
Information contained on this page is provided by an independent third-party content provider. This website makes no warranties or representations in connection therewith. If you are affiliated with this page and would like it removed please contact editor @saltlakecityutah.business
